https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770981 The Delhi High Court addressed whether interference in writ jurisdiction was warranted against the impugned demand order and whether the petitioner should instead pursue pending rectification proceedings. It disposed of the petition by directing that the rectification application be heard after affording the petitioner a personal hearing, while keeping all rights and remedies open. The order thus left the substantive dispute unresolved and channelled the matter to the rectification process with procedural fairness. en-us Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2025 11:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770981 The Delhi High Court addressed whether interference in writ jurisdiction was warranted against the impugned demand order and whether the petitioner should instead pursue pending rectification proceedings. It disposed of the petition by directing that the rectification application be heard after affording the petitioner a personal hearing, while keeping all rights and remedies open. The order thus left the substantive dispute unresolved and channelled the matter to the rectification process with procedural fairness. Case-Laws GST Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770981