<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1260 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770988</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to an assessment order was declined where the authority had considered the taxpayer&#039;s reply and granted a personal hearing, including a reminder that was not utilised. The court held that no interference was warranted in writ jurisdiction because the statutory appellate remedy remained available, and the petitioner was relegated to the appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1260 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770988</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to an assessment order was declined where the authority had considered the taxpayer&#039;s reply and granted a personal hearing, including a reminder that was not utilised. The court held that no interference was warranted in writ jurisdiction because the statutory appellate remedy remained available, and the petitioner was relegated to the appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>