<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1743 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462056</link>
    <description>Tribunal addressed pre-deposit requirements under section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant challenged service tax demands totaling Rs. 13,66,31,566/-, with the impugned order confirming Rs. 8,29,53,025/-. The Tribunal ruled that only Rs. 45 Lakhs of voluntary payment could be set off against pre-deposit, requiring the appellant to deposit an additional Rs. 62,21,477/- within one month to proceed with the appeal. Procedural filing requirements were deemed compliant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 May 2025 13:52:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1743 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462056</link>
      <description>Tribunal addressed pre-deposit requirements under section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant challenged service tax demands totaling Rs. 13,66,31,566/-, with the impugned order confirming Rs. 8,29,53,025/-. The Tribunal ruled that only Rs. 45 Lakhs of voluntary payment could be set off against pre-deposit, requiring the appellant to deposit an additional Rs. 62,21,477/- within one month to proceed with the appeal. Procedural filing requirements were deemed compliant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>