https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43723 The Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner, upholding the Customs Department's allegations of non-disclosure and misdeclaration of goods during importation. The Court found that the Customs Officers had the authority to detain goods even after clearance and established a prima facie case based on fraud and deliberate suppression by the petitioner. The case was referred to the Adjudicating Authority under the Customs Act for further proceedings, directing the petitioner to respond to the show cause notice within a specified timeframe. en-us Thu, 14 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:38:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43723 The Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner, upholding the Customs Department's allegations of non-disclosure and misdeclaration of goods during importation. The Court found that the Customs Officers had the authority to detain goods even after clearance and established a prima facie case based on fraud and deliberate suppression by the petitioner. The case was referred to the Adjudicating Authority under the Customs Act for further proceedings, directing the petitioner to respond to the show cause notice within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 14 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43723