https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43722 The court allowed the writ petitions, emphasizing errors in rejection orders and the need for proper consideration of the petitioner's request for adhoc exemption under Section 25(2) of the Customs Act. The court quashed the rejection orders, directing authorities to reassess the request and granting the petitioner the opportunity to submit additional representations within eight weeks. The court stressed the importance of a personal hearing and consideration of exceptional circumstances, instructing the continuation of the bank guarantee until a final decision is reached. en-us Tue, 26 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:30:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43722 The court allowed the writ petitions, emphasizing errors in rejection orders and the need for proper consideration of the petitioner's request for adhoc exemption under Section 25(2) of the Customs Act. The court quashed the rejection orders, directing authorities to reassess the request and granting the petitioner the opportunity to submit additional representations within eight weeks. The court stressed the importance of a personal hearing and consideration of exceptional circumstances, instructing the continuation of the bank guarantee until a final decision is reached. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43722