<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Minority Shareholders with Minimal Ownership in Negotiable Instruments Case</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88468</link>
    <description>HC allowed the petitions, quashing proceedings under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that mere association with the accused company through minimal shareholding (0.3%) does not automatically establish vicarious criminal liability. To attract liability under Section 141, petitioners must be conclusively proven to be in charge of and responsible for the accused company&#039;s business conduct at the time of the offense. Petitioners were neither signatories to the cheques nor responsible for the company&#039;s affairs, thus exempting them from criminal culpability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 08:39:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 08:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Minority Shareholders with Minimal Ownership in Negotiable Instruments Case</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88468</link>
      <description>HC allowed the petitions, quashing proceedings under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that mere association with the accused company through minimal shareholding (0.3%) does not automatically establish vicarious criminal liability. To attract liability under Section 141, petitioners must be conclusively proven to be in charge of and responsible for the accused company&#039;s business conduct at the time of the offense. Petitioners were neither signatories to the cheques nor responsible for the company&#039;s affairs, thus exempting them from criminal culpability.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 08:39:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>