<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1157 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770885</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding a civil contractor&#039;s application of ICDS III for revenue recognition. The assessee correctly followed the Percentage of Completion Method (POCM) as mandated by ICDS III, accounting for entire revenue in computing total income. The tribunal held that GST payment based on invoices rather than POCM had no implication on income computation. The assessee&#039;s declared income of Rs. 9,79,75,000 on gross POCM of Rs. 42,26,67,000 represented a reasonable 23.18% net margin, while the AO&#039;s proposed addition would create an improbable 48.64% margin. The CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 08:39:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1157 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770885</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding a civil contractor&#039;s application of ICDS III for revenue recognition. The assessee correctly followed the Percentage of Completion Method (POCM) as mandated by ICDS III, accounting for entire revenue in computing total income. The tribunal held that GST payment based on invoices rather than POCM had no implication on income computation. The assessee&#039;s declared income of Rs. 9,79,75,000 on gross POCM of Rs. 42,26,67,000 represented a reasonable 23.18% net margin, while the AO&#039;s proposed addition would create an improbable 48.64% margin. The CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>