<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1164 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770892</link>
    <description>Where no exempt income was earned during the relevant assessment year, disallowance of expenditure under section 14A could not be sustained because no expenditure could be attributed to earning exempt income. The first appellate authority noted that section 14A had no application on these facts, and the ITAT upheld that view. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected, and the disallowance was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 08:39:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1164 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770892</link>
      <description>Where no exempt income was earned during the relevant assessment year, disallowance of expenditure under section 14A could not be sustained because no expenditure could be attributed to earning exempt income. The first appellate authority noted that section 14A had no application on these facts, and the ITAT upheld that view. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected, and the disallowance was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>