https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770899 ITAT PUNE allowed appeals for statistical purposes and restored both orders to CIT(A). The case involved procedural irregularities where CPC continued processing under section 143(1) despite scrutiny notice under section 143(2) being issued. CIT(A) dismissed one appeal in limine despite valid reasons for 827-day delay and passed a cryptic order in another appeal against section 143(3) assessment. ITAT directed CIT(A) to re-adjudicate both appeals on merits with proper hearing opportunity. en-us Wed, 14 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 May 2025 08:39:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770899 ITAT PUNE allowed appeals for statistical purposes and restored both orders to CIT(A). The case involved procedural irregularities where CPC continued processing under section 143(1) despite scrutiny notice under section 143(2) being issued. CIT(A) dismissed one appeal in limine despite valid reasons for 827-day delay and passed a cryptic order in another appeal against section 143(3) assessment. ITAT directed CIT(A) to re-adjudicate both appeals on merits with proper hearing opportunity. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 14 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770899