<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1185 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770913</link>
    <description>Interim protection against coercive recovery was granted where the demand was stated to have been uploaded erroneously and rectification was said to be required. The Delhi HC noted that the concerned departments could pass rectification orders by the next hearing and, pending further consideration, directed that no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1185 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770913</link>
      <description>Interim protection against coercive recovery was granted where the demand was stated to have been uploaded erroneously and rectification was said to be required. The Delhi HC noted that the concerned departments could pass rectification orders by the next hearing and, pending further consideration, directed that no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>