https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43708 The court dismissed the petition challenging detention orders as the petitioner failed to challenge earlier orders regarding excise duty penalties and confiscation, which were prerequisites for challenging the detention orders. The court found the petitioner's argument of compliance with conditions invalid as relevant period compliance was not proven. The request to consider legality of previous orders was rejected due to lack of specific challenge despite awareness. Consequently, the court ruled against the petitioner, resulting in the dismissal of the petition without costs. en-us Wed, 24 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:34:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43708 The court dismissed the petition challenging detention orders as the petitioner failed to challenge earlier orders regarding excise duty penalties and confiscation, which were prerequisites for challenging the detention orders. The court found the petitioner's argument of compliance with conditions invalid as relevant period compliance was not proven. The request to consider legality of previous orders was rejected due to lack of specific challenge despite awareness. Consequently, the court ruled against the petitioner, resulting in the dismissal of the petition without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43708