<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1458 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462041</link>
    <description>Appeals under the Central Excise Act must be filed within the prescribed limitation period, and Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not apply to such proceedings. As a result, neither the Commissioner (Appeals) nor the Tribunal has power to condone a delayed appeal. On the facts noted, a delay of about three years and an illness-based explanation were insufficient to overcome the statutory bar, so the appeal could not be entertained and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2025 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1458 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462041</link>
      <description>Appeals under the Central Excise Act must be filed within the prescribed limitation period, and Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not apply to such proceedings. As a result, neither the Commissioner (Appeals) nor the Tribunal has power to condone a delayed appeal. On the facts noted, a delay of about three years and an illness-based explanation were insufficient to overcome the statutory bar, so the appeal could not be entertained and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>