https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43702 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, declaring the Assistant Collector's orders invalid and void due to lack of jurisdiction. The Court emphasized that the Assistant Collector exceeded authority in withdrawing credits and issuing demands, noting the absence of revisional power. The petitioner's challenge to the Central Excise orders was upheld, granting relief through a Writ of Mandamus and allowing the petition with costs. en-us Wed, 21 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:28:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43702 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, declaring the Assistant Collector's orders invalid and void due to lack of jurisdiction. The Court emphasized that the Assistant Collector exceeded authority in withdrawing credits and issuing demands, noting the absence of revisional power. The petitioner's challenge to the Central Excise orders was upheld, granting relief through a Writ of Mandamus and allowing the petition with costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43702