<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1504 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462035</link>
    <description>A fourth request for suspension of sentence was rejected because the earlier application had already been refused on merits after considering the appellant&#039;s criminal antecedents and the allegations, and no fresh change in circumstances was shown. The medical record noted COPD with acute exacerbation, pulmonary hypertension, cor pulmonale, systemic hypertension and PLWHA, but it also showed improvement and did not establish any deterioration since the prior rejection. The court treated the cited precedent as factually distinct, since that case involved a much more severe incapacity and need for attendants. Suspension of sentence was therefore declined on both merits and medical grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 13:59:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1504 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462035</link>
      <description>A fourth request for suspension of sentence was rejected because the earlier application had already been refused on merits after considering the appellant&#039;s criminal antecedents and the allegations, and no fresh change in circumstances was shown. The medical record noted COPD with acute exacerbation, pulmonary hypertension, cor pulmonale, systemic hypertension and PLWHA, but it also showed improvement and did not establish any deterioration since the prior rejection. The court treated the cited precedent as factually distinct, since that case involved a much more severe incapacity and need for attendants. Suspension of sentence was therefore declined on both merits and medical grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>