<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Long-Term Capital Gains Dispute Resolved: Cyprus Entity Validates Genuine Business Presence and Tax Treaty Eligibility</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88453</link>
    <description>ITAT adjudicated a cross-border taxation dispute involving long-term capital gains (LTCG) from share sale under India-Cyprus Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The tribunal conclusively determined that the assessee, incorporated in Cyprus, was genuinely managed from Cyprus and not a pass-through entity. Despite Revenue&#039;s allegations of treaty abuse, the tribunal found the assessee&#039;s submissions meritorious, affirming its entitlement to DTAA benefits. The tribunal rejected Revenue&#039;s contentions that the real beneficiaries were US-based, emphasizing the assessee&#039;s substantive presence and tax residency certificate in Cyprus. Consequently, the ground challenging DTAA applicability was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 08:40:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 08:40:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Long-Term Capital Gains Dispute Resolved: Cyprus Entity Validates Genuine Business Presence and Tax Treaty Eligibility</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88453</link>
      <description>ITAT adjudicated a cross-border taxation dispute involving long-term capital gains (LTCG) from share sale under India-Cyprus Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The tribunal conclusively determined that the assessee, incorporated in Cyprus, was genuinely managed from Cyprus and not a pass-through entity. Despite Revenue&#039;s allegations of treaty abuse, the tribunal found the assessee&#039;s submissions meritorious, affirming its entitlement to DTAA benefits. The tribunal rejected Revenue&#039;s contentions that the real beneficiaries were US-based, emphasizing the assessee&#039;s substantive presence and tax residency certificate in Cyprus. Consequently, the ground challenging DTAA applicability was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 08:40:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>