https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88443 HC allowed the petition challenging license denial, distinguishing between "contravention" and "offence" under indirect tax laws. The court found pending litigation does not automatically constitute an offence under para 3(2)(c) of the Regulation. No actual penalties were imposed against the petitioner's company or its officers. The impugned orders were quashed, directing respondents to issue the license within two weeks upon fulfilling other regulatory conditions, effectively rejecting the administrative denial based on pending legal proceedings. en-us Fri, 16 May 2025 08:40:38 +0530 Fri, 16 May 2025 08:40:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88443 HC allowed the petition challenging license denial, distinguishing between "contravention" and "offence" under indirect tax laws. The court found pending litigation does not automatically constitute an offence under para 3(2)(c) of the Regulation. No actual penalties were imposed against the petitioner's company or its officers. The impugned orders were quashed, directing respondents to issue the license within two weeks upon fulfilling other regulatory conditions, effectively rejecting the administrative denial based on pending legal proceedings. Highlights Customs Fri, 16 May 2025 08:40:38 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88443