<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1006 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770734</link>
    <description>Non-woven polypropylene fabrics were held classifiable under Chapter 56 because the tariff specifically covers non-woven fabrics and the Revenue produced no fresh corroborative evidence to support Chapter 39 reclassification; the exclusion for goods fully embedded in or coated with plastic was not shown to apply. The extended period of limitation was also unavailable because the assessee had regularly filed ER-1 returns disclosing Chapter 56 classification, those returns were accepted without objection, and no concealment or suppression was established. The tariff dispute therefore was resolved in favour of the assessee on both classification and limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 08:40:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1006 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770734</link>
      <description>Non-woven polypropylene fabrics were held classifiable under Chapter 56 because the tariff specifically covers non-woven fabrics and the Revenue produced no fresh corroborative evidence to support Chapter 39 reclassification; the exclusion for goods fully embedded in or coated with plastic was not shown to apply. The extended period of limitation was also unavailable because the assessee had regularly filed ER-1 returns disclosing Chapter 56 classification, those returns were accepted without objection, and no concealment or suppression was established. The tariff dispute therefore was resolved in favour of the assessee on both classification and limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>