<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1009 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770737</link>
    <description>Tribunal addressed CENVAT credit eligibility for input services used in factory setup after statutory amendment. Despite deletion of &quot;setting up of factory&quot; phrase from Rule 2(l), the court held that input services remain creditable if they have direct nexus to manufacturing process. Relying on precedent cases, the Tribunal affirmed broad interpretation of input service definition, dismissing department&#039;s appeal and upholding credit admissibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 08:40:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1009 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770737</link>
      <description>Tribunal addressed CENVAT credit eligibility for input services used in factory setup after statutory amendment. Despite deletion of &quot;setting up of factory&quot; phrase from Rule 2(l), the court held that input services remain creditable if they have direct nexus to manufacturing process. Relying on precedent cases, the Tribunal affirmed broad interpretation of input service definition, dismissing department&#039;s appeal and upholding credit admissibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>