<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 116 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43687</link>
    <description>The court quashed the orders and set aside the judgment of the learned single Judge, allowing the appeal and the writ petition. The penalty imposed on the appellant was found to be unsupported by legal evidence, and the reliance on retracted statements of co-accused without corroboration was deemed insufficient to establish guilt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:53:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 116 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43687</link>
      <description>The court quashed the orders and set aside the judgment of the learned single Judge, allowing the appeal and the writ petition. The penalty imposed on the appellant was found to be unsupported by legal evidence, and the reliance on retracted statements of co-accused without corroboration was deemed insufficient to establish guilt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>