<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1060 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770788</link>
    <description>ITAT dismissed the appeal regarding disallowance of employees&#039; contribution to EPF and ESIC deposited after statutory due dates but before filing return u/s 139. The court held that despite the return being processed u/s 143(1)(a) before the Checkmate judgment, payments made after due dates remain disallowable under section 36(1)(va) read with section 43B. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision following Allied Motors and consistent with Checkmate was upheld as justified and well-reasoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 12:44:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1060 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770788</link>
      <description>ITAT dismissed the appeal regarding disallowance of employees&#039; contribution to EPF and ESIC deposited after statutory due dates but before filing return u/s 139. The court held that despite the return being processed u/s 143(1)(a) before the Checkmate judgment, payments made after due dates remain disallowable under section 36(1)(va) read with section 43B. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision following Allied Motors and consistent with Checkmate was upheld as justified and well-reasoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>