<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1073 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770801</link>
    <description>Tribunal ruled on two key issues in tax law: (1) validity of Section 143(1) intimation without prior show cause notice, and (2) service of notice on an email address different from ITR. The HC found that notices sent to the assessee&#039;s registered email address were legally valid, even if different from the ITR-mentioned address. The Revenue&#039;s communication was deemed proper, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 08:40:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1073 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770801</link>
      <description>Tribunal ruled on two key issues in tax law: (1) validity of Section 143(1) intimation without prior show cause notice, and (2) service of notice on an email address different from ITR. The HC found that notices sent to the assessee&#039;s registered email address were legally valid, even if different from the ITR-mentioned address. The Revenue&#039;s communication was deemed proper, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>