<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1082 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770810</link>
    <description>AT allowed assessee&#039;s appeal on two key grounds: (1) condonation of 640-day delay, finding the delay unintentional and caused by oversight, and (2) deletion of ad hoc Rs. 10 lakh expense disallowance due to lack of specific documentary evidence by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was ultimately decided in favor of the assessee, emphasizing principles of substantial justice and procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 14:17:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1082 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770810</link>
      <description>AT allowed assessee&#039;s appeal on two key grounds: (1) condonation of 640-day delay, finding the delay unintentional and caused by oversight, and (2) deletion of ad hoc Rs. 10 lakh expense disallowance due to lack of specific documentary evidence by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was ultimately decided in favor of the assessee, emphasizing principles of substantial justice and procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>