<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1093 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770821</link>
    <description>The HC considered a case involving unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal deleted an addition of Rs. 15,00,000/- based on the non-retrospective applicability of source verification provisions for AY 2011-12. The HC declined to interfere, noting the limited tax effect, but left open substantial legal questions regarding the evidentiary requirements for establishing the genuineness of cash credit transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 08:40:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1093 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770821</link>
      <description>The HC considered a case involving unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal deleted an addition of Rs. 15,00,000/- based on the non-retrospective applicability of source verification provisions for AY 2011-12. The HC declined to interfere, noting the limited tax effect, but left open substantial legal questions regarding the evidentiary requirements for establishing the genuineness of cash credit transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>