https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770831 AAR rejected the advance ruling application for imported car seats due to lack of specificity and jurisdictional limitations. The ruling found the applicant's queries about GST classification, customs procedures, and parts classification were vague and not sufficiently detailed to warrant a substantive ruling under Section 97(2) of the CGST Act. The application was dismissed without addressing the substantive tax questions. en-us Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 May 2025 12:18:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770831 AAR rejected the advance ruling application for imported car seats due to lack of specificity and jurisdictional limitations. The ruling found the applicant's queries about GST classification, customs procedures, and parts classification were vague and not sufficiently detailed to warrant a substantive ruling under Section 97(2) of the CGST Act. The application was dismissed without addressing the substantive tax questions. Case-Laws GST Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770831