https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43678 The Court interfered with refusal to modify the pre-deposit exemption because the Tribunal had not considered the later decision relied on by the petitioner, and sending the matter back would only delay the appeal and duplicate proceedings. To secure an early determination, the Court set aside the impugned order and directed that the appeal be heard without insisting on the deposit condition, with disposal within two months. en-us Mon, 20 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:36:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43678 The Court interfered with refusal to modify the pre-deposit exemption because the Tribunal had not considered the later decision relied on by the petitioner, and sending the matter back would only delay the appeal and duplicate proceedings. To secure an early determination, the Court set aside the impugned order and directed that the appeal be heard without insisting on the deposit condition, with disposal within two months. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 20 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43678