https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462015 Open justice was treated as a foundational principle extending to live streaming as a technological means of improving transparency, access to justice, public confidence, legal awareness, and accountability. The Court recognised, however, that live access must be balanced against dignity of the institution, privacy of litigants and witnesses, confidentiality, and the proper administration of justice. It therefore approved live streaming in principle only within a structured regulatory framework, including phased implementation, limits to suitable categories of cases, prior consent and judicial control, exclusion of sensitive matters, transmission delay, archiving, copyright retention by the Court, and limits on unauthorised use. Judicial discretion was preserved to exclude or suspend coverage where justice requires. en-us Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 May 2025 13:06:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462015 Open justice was treated as a foundational principle extending to live streaming as a technological means of improving transparency, access to justice, public confidence, legal awareness, and accountability. The Court recognised, however, that live access must be balanced against dignity of the institution, privacy of litigants and witnesses, confidentiality, and the proper administration of justice. It therefore approved live streaming in principle only within a structured regulatory framework, including phased implementation, limits to suitable categories of cases, prior consent and judicial control, exclusion of sensitive matters, transmission delay, archiving, copyright retention by the Court, and limits on unauthorised use. Judicial discretion was preserved to exclude or suspend coverage where justice requires. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462015