<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1742 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462018</link>
    <description>Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 confers a statutory right to post-award interest from the date of the award to the date of payment, and that entitlement cannot be excluded by a contractual clause prohibiting interest. The phrase &quot;unless the award otherwise directs&quot; in clause (b) governs the rate of interest, not the existence of the right to interest itself, while clause (a) remains subject to party agreement. A contractual term barring interest therefore cannot override the statutory mandate for post-award interest, and the contrary view based on precedent concerning pendente lite interest was inapposite.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 20:06:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1742 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462018</link>
      <description>Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 confers a statutory right to post-award interest from the date of the award to the date of payment, and that entitlement cannot be excluded by a contractual clause prohibiting interest. The phrase &quot;unless the award otherwise directs&quot; in clause (b) governs the rate of interest, not the existence of the right to interest itself, while clause (a) remains subject to party agreement. A contractual term barring interest therefore cannot override the statutory mandate for post-award interest, and the contrary view based on precedent concerning pendente lite interest was inapposite.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>