https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43674 The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the petitioners' claim of clearing dutiable goods as non-dutiable items. Despite acknowledging the petitioners' financial challenges, the Tribunal required a substantial deposit for appeal hearings. To address the fairness of the process, the court modified the deposit amount to Rs. 30,00,000 in two installments, ensuring a balance between the parties' interests. The writ petition was disposed of on merits, considering the complexities of the case and the need for a fair hearing. en-us Thu, 23 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:26:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43674 The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the petitioners' claim of clearing dutiable goods as non-dutiable items. Despite acknowledging the petitioners' financial challenges, the Tribunal required a substantial deposit for appeal hearings. To address the fairness of the process, the court modified the deposit amount to Rs. 30,00,000 in two installments, ensuring a balance between the parties' interests. The writ petition was disposed of on merits, considering the complexities of the case and the need for a fair hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43674