<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1636 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462023</link>
    <description>CESTAT Allahabad allowed the appeal by remand in a service tax recovery case. The tribunal upheld the search warrant validity, finding no perversity in the officer&#039;s reasonable belief. For club membership charges, penalty of Rs. 67,845 under Section 78 was set aside as the appellant had paid the entire service tax amount before the show cause notice. The matter was remanded to the Original Authority for re-computation of taxable values for Construction of Residential Complex Services, considering proper classification, abatements, cum-tax benefit, and Point of Taxation Rules. Penalties on the director under Section 78A were set aside due to lack of evidence establishing knowledge or involvement in evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 20:06:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1636 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462023</link>
      <description>CESTAT Allahabad allowed the appeal by remand in a service tax recovery case. The tribunal upheld the search warrant validity, finding no perversity in the officer&#039;s reasonable belief. For club membership charges, penalty of Rs. 67,845 under Section 78 was set aside as the appellant had paid the entire service tax amount before the show cause notice. The matter was remanded to the Original Authority for re-computation of taxable values for Construction of Residential Complex Services, considering proper classification, abatements, cum-tax benefit, and Point of Taxation Rules. Penalties on the director under Section 78A were set aside due to lack of evidence establishing knowledge or involvement in evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>