<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1269 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462028</link>
    <description>The matter concerned penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 and a remand for de novo adjudication of penal liability under Section 112. The appellant&#039;s counsel stated that instructions had been received to withdraw the appeal, and the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. No further substantive determination on the penalty issue was made in the extracted text.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 20:06:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1269 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462028</link>
      <description>The matter concerned penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 and a remand for de novo adjudication of penal liability under Section 112. The appellant&#039;s counsel stated that instructions had been received to withdraw the appeal, and the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. No further substantive determination on the penalty issue was made in the extracted text.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>