<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 93 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43673</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision due to lack of notice to the petitioners, ruling that the Tribunal exceeded the scope of the show cause notice by relying on new reports without prior notification. The goods were already cleared by interim order, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision and the Additional Collector&#039;s order were overturned. The redemption fine of Rs. 1,50,000 was to be refunded to the petitioners, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:25:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 93 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43673</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision due to lack of notice to the petitioners, ruling that the Tribunal exceeded the scope of the show cause notice by relying on new reports without prior notification. The goods were already cleared by interim order, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision and the Additional Collector&#039;s order were overturned. The redemption fine of Rs. 1,50,000 was to be refunded to the petitioners, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>