<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 1069 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462012</link>
    <description>In consolidation proceedings, delay in filing a restoration application should be assessed on a liberal and pragmatic construction of &quot;sufficient cause&quot;, with substantial justice preferred over technical objections and the explanation for delay treated as more important than its length. Although the record showed negligence by the applicants and no day-to-day explanation of delay, the matter had not been decided on merits and had repeatedly been dismissed in default. In those circumstances, the refusal to condone delay was held unsustainable, the delay was directed to be condoned, and the matter was to be heard on merits on payment of costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 17:50:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 1069 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462012</link>
      <description>In consolidation proceedings, delay in filing a restoration application should be assessed on a liberal and pragmatic construction of &quot;sufficient cause&quot;, with substantial justice preferred over technical objections and the explanation for delay treated as more important than its length. Although the record showed negligence by the applicants and no day-to-day explanation of delay, the matter had not been decided on merits and had repeatedly been dismissed in default. In those circumstances, the refusal to condone delay was held unsustainable, the delay was directed to be condoned, and the matter was to be heard on merits on payment of costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>