<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43662</link>
    <description>A claim for waiver of demurrage charges had to be reconsidered because the earlier rejection rested on an incorrect reading of the governing public notice. The revised notice covered detention caused by bona fide customs formalities, and the detention certificate could not be rejected on a mere technical objection where the authorities had acted without proper awareness of the applicable guidelines. The claim was therefore required to be re-examined under the modified public notice and the relevant Port Trust resolution. Limitation was not available as a fresh objection at that stage, because the application had already been dealt with on merits and the substituted certificate was filed in place of the earlier one.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:57:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43662</link>
      <description>A claim for waiver of demurrage charges had to be reconsidered because the earlier rejection rested on an incorrect reading of the governing public notice. The revised notice covered detention caused by bona fide customs formalities, and the detention certificate could not be rejected on a mere technical objection where the authorities had acted without proper awareness of the applicable guidelines. The claim was therefore required to be re-examined under the modified public notice and the relevant Port Trust resolution. Limitation was not available as a fresh objection at that stage, because the application had already been dealt with on merits and the substituted certificate was filed in place of the earlier one.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>