<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Judicial Discretion Prevails: Court&#039;s Exclusive Power to Recall Witnesses Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC and Section 165 Evidence Act</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88407</link>
    <description>SC held that under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC and Section 165 of Evidence Act, the power to recall a witness is exclusively within the court&#039;s discretion. The court may exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 151 CPC to permit a party to recall a witness if circumstances warrant, but such recall is not an automatic right. Cross-examination of a recalled witness requires explicit court permission. The court&#039;s primary objective is to discover or obtain proper proof of relevant facts. The Special Leave Petitions were consequently dismissed, affirming the court&#039;s broad discretionary power in witness examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 07:32:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 07:32:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Judicial Discretion Prevails: Court&#039;s Exclusive Power to Recall Witnesses Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC and Section 165 Evidence Act</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88407</link>
      <description>SC held that under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC and Section 165 of Evidence Act, the power to recall a witness is exclusively within the court&#039;s discretion. The court may exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 151 CPC to permit a party to recall a witness if circumstances warrant, but such recall is not an automatic right. Cross-examination of a recalled witness requires explicit court permission. The court&#039;s primary objective is to discover or obtain proper proof of relevant facts. The Special Leave Petitions were consequently dismissed, affirming the court&#039;s broad discretionary power in witness examination.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 07:32:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>