https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770660 Order 18 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure is a narrow procedural power meant for the Court's own use to clarify ambiguities, remove doubts, or put questions necessary for proper adjudication. It cannot be used by a party as a routine device to reopen evidence, fill gaps in its case, or secure a fresh opportunity for examination, cross-examination, or re-examination. Any resort to the Court's inherent powers under Section 151 must be exceptional, bona fide, and genuinely necessary for clarification, not a delaying or protracting tactic. On the stated principles, the request to recall the witness was rejected. en-us Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 May 2025 07:32:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770660 Order 18 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure is a narrow procedural power meant for the Court's own use to clarify ambiguities, remove doubts, or put questions necessary for proper adjudication. It cannot be used by a party as a routine device to reopen evidence, fill gaps in its case, or secure a fresh opportunity for examination, cross-examination, or re-examination. Any resort to the Court's inherent powers under Section 151 must be exceptional, bona fide, and genuinely necessary for clarification, not a delaying or protracting tactic. On the stated principles, the request to recall the witness was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770660