https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770673 The Supreme Court recorded that the petitioner had not challenged the earlier appellate order, leaving only the limited scope identified in the prior judgment. It also noted a prima facie view that the High Court had not examined the questions raised by the petitioner concerning the duty demand. On that basis, notice was issued returnable after six weeks, with liberty to serve the respondent through the Central Agency and to correct or replace pages. en-us Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 May 2025 07:32:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770673 The Supreme Court recorded that the petitioner had not challenged the earlier appellate order, leaving only the limited scope identified in the prior judgment. It also noted a prima facie view that the High Court had not examined the questions raised by the petitioner concerning the duty demand. On that basis, notice was issued returnable after six weeks, with liberty to serve the respondent through the Central Agency and to correct or replace pages. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770673