<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 112 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43657</link>
    <description>The court examined the applicability of promissory estoppel in a case involving customs duty regulations under Section 157 of the Customs Act. Petitioners, importers of photographic goods, claimed reliance on previous regulations for concessional rates, affected by subsequent changes. The court questioned whether regulations under Section 157 are akin to statutes, diverging from a prior ruling. It referred the matter to a larger bench to determine if promissory estoppel can be invoked against such regulations. The judgment underscores the need for clarity on the legal status of regulations under Section 157 regarding promissory estoppel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:47:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 112 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43657</link>
      <description>The court examined the applicability of promissory estoppel in a case involving customs duty regulations under Section 157 of the Customs Act. Petitioners, importers of photographic goods, claimed reliance on previous regulations for concessional rates, affected by subsequent changes. The court questioned whether regulations under Section 157 are akin to statutes, diverging from a prior ruling. It referred the matter to a larger bench to determine if promissory estoppel can be invoked against such regulations. The judgment underscores the need for clarity on the legal status of regulations under Section 157 regarding promissory estoppel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>