<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 957 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770685</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai held that additions under sections 68 and 69C for unexplained cash credit and expenditure could not be sustained. The tribunal found that the shares in question were not penny stocks in the relevant assessment year. Consequently, the additions made by the Assessing Officer under both sections 68 and 69C were deleted. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed on merit, resulting in a favorable outcome for the taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 15:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 957 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770685</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai held that additions under sections 68 and 69C for unexplained cash credit and expenditure could not be sustained. The tribunal found that the shares in question were not penny stocks in the relevant assessment year. Consequently, the additions made by the Assessing Officer under both sections 68 and 69C were deleted. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed on merit, resulting in a favorable outcome for the taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>