<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 959 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770687</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai held that reassessment proceedings based on Client Code Modification transactions in NSEL Exchange were invalid. The tribunal found that such modifications are regular business practices used by brokers to rectify order entry errors. Without establishing a cogent link between the assessee and broker&#039;s actions, reassessment cannot be justified on mere suspicion that income escaped assessment. The CIT(A)&#039;s order declaring the reassessment invalid was upheld, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 07:32:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 959 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770687</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai held that reassessment proceedings based on Client Code Modification transactions in NSEL Exchange were invalid. The tribunal found that such modifications are regular business practices used by brokers to rectify order entry errors. Without establishing a cogent link between the assessee and broker&#039;s actions, reassessment cannot be justified on mere suspicion that income escaped assessment. The CIT(A)&#039;s order declaring the reassessment invalid was upheld, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>