<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43656</link>
    <description>The Court found in favor of the appellant regarding the enhancement of the value of imported goods by Customs Authorities, remanding the matter for a fresh assessment. The appellant was allowed to move goods to another warehouse upon discharging the lien and providing security for warehousing charges. Customs duty was not to be levied on stolen goods, and the appellant was directed to pay duty only on goods found after the theft. Security was ordered to secure the claim of the Warehousing Corporation, with instructions for its retention and return based on certain conditions. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:45:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43656</link>
      <description>The Court found in favor of the appellant regarding the enhancement of the value of imported goods by Customs Authorities, remanding the matter for a fresh assessment. The appellant was allowed to move goods to another warehouse upon discharging the lien and providing security for warehousing charges. Customs duty was not to be levied on stolen goods, and the appellant was directed to pay duty only on goods found after the theft. Security was ordered to secure the claim of the Warehousing Corporation, with instructions for its retention and return based on certain conditions. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>