<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 961 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770689</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment order dated 31/03/2022 passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 for lack of jurisdiction. AO failed to dispose of assessee&#039;s objections to reopening through speaking order as mandated by SC in GKN Driveshaft case. Assessee had complied with SC judgment requirements while AO breached statutory obligation to address objections before passing reassessment order. Decision favored assessee against revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 07:32:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 961 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770689</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment order dated 31/03/2022 passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 for lack of jurisdiction. AO failed to dispose of assessee&#039;s objections to reopening through speaking order as mandated by SC in GKN Driveshaft case. Assessee had complied with SC judgment requirements while AO breached statutory obligation to address objections before passing reassessment order. Decision favored assessee against revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>