<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 965 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770693</link>
    <description>In a tax dispute involving cash deposits during demonetization, the Tribunal deleted an addition of Rs. 2,24,69,739/- made by the AO under Section 68. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s documentary evidence substantiated the cash deposits from business transactions. It held that the enhanced tax rate under Section 115BBE applies only from AY 2018-19 and that the addition constituted impermissible double counting of income already declared as a loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 18:47:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 965 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770693</link>
      <description>In a tax dispute involving cash deposits during demonetization, the Tribunal deleted an addition of Rs. 2,24,69,739/- made by the AO under Section 68. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s documentary evidence substantiated the cash deposits from business transactions. It held that the enhanced tax rate under Section 115BBE applies only from AY 2018-19 and that the addition constituted impermissible double counting of income already declared as a loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>