<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 974 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770702</link>
    <description>ITAT Surat upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition under section 69A. Revenue failed to rebut CIT(A)&#039;s finding that the counterparty was engaged in normal business operations. The assessee had already offered sales realization as income, which was accepted by AO. Following Gujarat HC precedent in Vishal Exports case, adding the same amount again under section 69A would constitute double taxation. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as they produced no evidence to contradict CIT(A)&#039;s findings regarding the legitimacy of business transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 07:32:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 974 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770702</link>
      <description>ITAT Surat upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition under section 69A. Revenue failed to rebut CIT(A)&#039;s finding that the counterparty was engaged in normal business operations. The assessee had already offered sales realization as income, which was accepted by AO. Following Gujarat HC precedent in Vishal Exports case, adding the same amount again under section 69A would constitute double taxation. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as they produced no evidence to contradict CIT(A)&#039;s findings regarding the legitimacy of business transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>