https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43654 A vague or unparticularised plea of limitation need not be adjudicated as a matter of obligation, and where the record indicates clandestine manufacture, unlicensed clearance, suppression of material facts, and intent to evade duty, the extended limitation period under the proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 may apply. The text also notes that interlocutory pre-deposit orders granting partial dispensation or extension of time are ordinarily not interfered with in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 absent clear injustice or jurisdictional error. On that basis, the Tribunal's pre-deposit order was treated as free from legal infirmity. en-us Thu, 03 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:30:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43654 A vague or unparticularised plea of limitation need not be adjudicated as a matter of obligation, and where the record indicates clandestine manufacture, unlicensed clearance, suppression of material facts, and intent to evade duty, the extended limitation period under the proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 may apply. The text also notes that interlocutory pre-deposit orders granting partial dispensation or extension of time are ordinarily not interfered with in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 absent clear injustice or jurisdictional error. On that basis, the Tribunal's pre-deposit order was treated as free from legal infirmity. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43654