<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 89 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43653</link>
    <description>The court found that the Additional Collector of Customs failed to consider the market price on the date of importation when imposing a redemption fine and penalty. The court emphasized that the redemption fine should reflect the maximum profit possible. The Collector&#039;s decision to enhance the redemption fine based on the market price at the date of adjudication was incorrect. The court emphasized the importance of providing a hearing before exercising powers under section 129D and clarified that the date of importation is crucial for determining the market price. The court set aside previous orders and directed a fresh adjudication with specific instructions for the Additional Collector.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:26:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 89 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43653</link>
      <description>The court found that the Additional Collector of Customs failed to consider the market price on the date of importation when imposing a redemption fine and penalty. The court emphasized that the redemption fine should reflect the maximum profit possible. The Collector&#039;s decision to enhance the redemption fine based on the market price at the date of adjudication was incorrect. The court emphasized the importance of providing a hearing before exercising powers under section 129D and clarified that the date of importation is crucial for determining the market price. The court set aside previous orders and directed a fresh adjudication with specific instructions for the Additional Collector.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>