https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770718 Where confiscation orders are not challenged and entitlement to release depends on disputed facts about documents, the High Court will ordinarily decline to grant provisional release in writ jurisdiction. The proper course is to pursue the statutory remedies under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, including release by the proper officer where permissible under Section 130(7) or an appeal under Section 107. Article 226 relief was treated as inappropriate in these circumstances, and the parties were left to work out remedies under the statutory framework. en-us Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Nov 2025 14:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770718 Where confiscation orders are not challenged and entitlement to release depends on disputed facts about documents, the High Court will ordinarily decline to grant provisional release in writ jurisdiction. The proper course is to pursue the statutory remedies under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, including release by the proper officer where permissible under Section 130(7) or an appeal under Section 107. Article 226 relief was treated as inappropriate in these circumstances, and the parties were left to work out remedies under the statutory framework. Case-Laws GST Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770718