https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770721 Delhi HC dismissed the writ petition challenging tax levy on fund expenses reimbursements. The petitioner argued that reimbursements for fund expenses were wrongly taxed as consideration for services. The court held that determining whether establishment expenses constitute management fees requires factual analysis beyond writ jurisdiction's scope. The petitioner's inconsistent positions regarding establishment charges necessitated detailed scrutiny of records and accounts. Since the impugned order was appealable under Section 107 of CGST Act 2017, and no jurisdictional defect or natural justice violation existed, the court directed the petitioner to pursue appellate remedies instead. en-us Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 May 2025 07:32:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770721 Delhi HC dismissed the writ petition challenging tax levy on fund expenses reimbursements. The petitioner argued that reimbursements for fund expenses were wrongly taxed as consideration for services. The court held that determining whether establishment expenses constitute management fees requires factual analysis beyond writ jurisdiction's scope. The petitioner's inconsistent positions regarding establishment charges necessitated detailed scrutiny of records and accounts. Since the impugned order was appealable under Section 107 of CGST Act 2017, and no jurisdictional defect or natural justice violation existed, the court directed the petitioner to pursue appellate remedies instead. Case-Laws GST Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770721