https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462010 Review jurisdiction under Section 114 and Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is confined to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record, while Section 151 and Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC permit recall of a witness only for limited clarification and not to fill omissions or reopen evidence as a routine matter. As the witness had already been cross-examined at length on the relevant issues and no electronic record or comparable material was produced to justify further questioning, the earlier decision was consistent with these limits. No error apparent on the face of the record was shown, and the request for further cross-examination was not justified; the review was dismissed. en-us Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 May 2025 07:14:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462010 Review jurisdiction under Section 114 and Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is confined to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record, while Section 151 and Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC permit recall of a witness only for limited clarification and not to fill omissions or reopen evidence as a routine matter. As the witness had already been cross-examined at length on the relevant issues and no electronic record or comparable material was produced to justify further questioning, the earlier decision was consistent with these limits. No error apparent on the face of the record was shown, and the request for further cross-examination was not justified; the review was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462010