<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 79 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43644</link>
    <description>A customs exemption or duty-variation notification under Section 25 of the Customs Act becomes legally effective only when it is duly published in the official gazette and made available to the public. A notification is not operative merely because it is dated or printed; affected persons must have access to its contents before it can be enforced against them. On the admitted facts, the gazette carrying the notification was placed on sale only after the importer had filed the Bill of Entry and paid duty, so the notification could not be used to levy duty to the importer&#039;s detriment. The challenge to Section 15 and other issues was left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:58:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 79 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43644</link>
      <description>A customs exemption or duty-variation notification under Section 25 of the Customs Act becomes legally effective only when it is duly published in the official gazette and made available to the public. A notification is not operative merely because it is dated or printed; affected persons must have access to its contents before it can be enforced against them. On the admitted facts, the gazette carrying the notification was placed on sale only after the importer had filed the Bill of Entry and paid duty, so the notification could not be used to levy duty to the importer&#039;s detriment. The challenge to Section 15 and other issues was left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>