<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Properties Attached Under PMLA Remain Seized Despite Mortgage, Ownership Claims Upheld on Proceeds Equivalent Basis</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88355</link>
    <description>The AT examined the attachment of properties under PMLA in a money laundering case. The tribunal held that properties can be attached even if mortgaged, as the appellants retain potential transfer rights. The ED&#039;s attachment was deemed valid since the original proceeds of crime were untraceable, and the attached properties represented equivalent value. The tribunal emphasized that PMLA&#039;s objective is to reach proceeds of crime regardless of nominal ownership. The court rejected arguments for property release or substitution, noting the fraud&#039;s quantum exceeded attached property values. Ultimately, the appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the enforcement agency&#039;s attachment proceedings and maintaining the properties&#039; status under PMLA&#039;s broad interpretative framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 07:48:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 07:48:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Properties Attached Under PMLA Remain Seized Despite Mortgage, Ownership Claims Upheld on Proceeds Equivalent Basis</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88355</link>
      <description>The AT examined the attachment of properties under PMLA in a money laundering case. The tribunal held that properties can be attached even if mortgaged, as the appellants retain potential transfer rights. The ED&#039;s attachment was deemed valid since the original proceeds of crime were untraceable, and the attached properties represented equivalent value. The tribunal emphasized that PMLA&#039;s objective is to reach proceeds of crime regardless of nominal ownership. The court rejected arguments for property release or substitution, noting the fraud&#039;s quantum exceeded attached property values. Ultimately, the appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the enforcement agency&#039;s attachment proceedings and maintaining the properties&#039; status under PMLA&#039;s broad interpretative framework.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 07:48:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>